FerretCoin: Difference between revisions

From Woozle Writes Code
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Technology: if that wasn't a typo, I can't remember what it stood for)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[FerretCoin]] (FC) is designed as a bridge between the unforgiving capitalist economy in which we currently live and the supportive socialist economy we want to create.
[[FerretCoin]] (FC) is designed as a bridge between the unforgiving capitalist economy in which we currently live and the supportive socialist economy we want to create.


It is a lightweight non-blockchain digital currency designed for small organizations that want to provide a guaranteed-minimum quality-of-life to their members, while also bringing in and accumulating resources from outside.
It is a lightweight ''non-blockchain'' digital currency, designed to be inexpensive to operate and decentralized while still having focal-points of accountability.
 
The larger goal is for this to be used by organizations that have some kind of revenue stream (from some combination of capitalism-compatible initiatives and donations) and want to provide a guaranteed-minimum quality-of-life to their members while also accumulating reserves of revenue and resources for the benefit of all.
==Goals==
==Goals==
* minimal use of resources (including storage, transactions, and issuance)
* minimal use of resources (including storage, transactions, and issuance)
* disincentivizes hoarding, while still permitting it
* disincentivizes hoarding, while still permitting it when needed
* sold/issued in a way that equalizes buying power as much as possible ("marginal value token")
* sold/issued in a way that equalizes buying power as much as possible ("marginal value token")
==Technology==
==Mechanisms==
Basics:
===Issuance Methods===
* A FC token is just a chunk of data public-key signed by the issuer. The data could include details of the issuance, such as timestamp, server ID information etc.
Issuers may use either or both of the following, depending on their resources and priorities:
* Trading (converting FC to/from other currencies) would be conducted through third parties approved by the issuer, possibly using some delegative FOAF/web-of-trust mechanism to encourage a trading ecosystem.
<html><details>
* The issuer would only accept payment for regular sales in FC, requiring all hoardable currency to pass through the various leveling mechanisms created by the FC ecosystem.
<summary><span style="font: 14pt bold;">Method One: Marginal Value Tokens</span></summary><blockquote>
Members of the issuing cooperative would have privileged access to that co-op's FC thusly:<ul>
<li> If your disposable income is below a certain  level, you receive regular allocations at no cost </li>
<li> If it's above that level, you have to buy them, but on a sliding-scale cost </li>
</ul>
 
Looked at more algorithmically, there would be a range of incomes relevant to the price:<ul>
<li> below the range, you get free regular allocations </li>
<li> within the range, the price goes up from zero to full price </li>
<li> above the range, FC are full price </li>
</ul>


Automatic inflation:
"Disposable income" is something the issuer would either evaluate themself or delegate to a trusted third party, based on any of several possible methodologies.
<ul>
<li> <b>Costs</b>: the difficulty of assessing income
<li> <b>Benefits</b>: stronger flow of downward redistribution
</ul>
</blockquote></details>
<details><summary><span style="font: 14pt bold;">Method Two: Universal Basic Income</span></summary><blockquote>
Under this method, all members would receive a regular allocation of FC, and could purchase additional FC at a fixed price.
<ul>
<li> <b>Costs</b>: There's less incentive to ever buy coins, so issuance would have to be much more limited -- which would hurt lower-income members disproportionately.
<li> <b>Benefits</b>: There's no need to assess income, saving costs and reducing barriers to entry.
</ul>
</blockquote></details></html>
===Intentional Inflation===
* At regular intervals, the issuer creates a new "series" of their FC.
* At regular intervals, the issuer creates a new "series" of their FC.
* The issuer only accepts the current series as payment for regular sales.
* The issuer only accepts the current series as payment for regular sales.
Line 22: Line 47:


This means that any given collection of FC will only deteriorate in value over time, encouraging holders to spend it instead of hoarding. This also allows the issuer to continually issue new coinage, giving it spending power ''without'' requiring taxation or continuous economic growth.
This means that any given collection of FC will only deteriorate in value over time, encouraging holders to spend it instead of hoarding. This also allows the issuer to continually issue new coinage, giving it spending power ''without'' requiring taxation or continuous economic growth.
 
==Technology==
==Issuance Policy==
Basics:
===Method One: Marginal Value Tokens===
* A FC token is just a chunk of data public-key signed by the issuer. The data could include details of the issuance, such as timestamp, server ID information etc.
Members of the issuing cooperative would have privileged access to that co-op's FC thusly:
* Trading (converting FC to/from other currencies) would be conducted through third parties approved by the issuer, possibly using some delegative FOAF/web-of-trust mechanism to encourage a trading ecosystem.
* If your disposable income is below a certain  level, you receive regular allocations at no cost
* The issuer would only accept payment for regular sales in FC, requiring all hoardable currency to pass through the various leveling mechanisms created by the FC ecosystem.
* If it's above that level, you have to buy them, but on a sliding-scale cost
 
Looked at more algorithmically, there would be a range of incomes relevant to the price:
* below the range, you get free regular allocations
* within the range, the price goes up from zero to full price
* above the range, FC are full price
 
"Disposable income" is something the issuer would either evaluate themself or delegate to a trusted third party, based on any of several possible methodologies.
 
* '''Costs''': the difficulty of assessing income
* '''Benefits''': stronger flow of downward redistribution
===Method Two: Universal Basic Income===
Under this method, all members would receive a regular allocation of FC, and could purchase additional FC at a fixed price.
 
* '''Costs''': There's less incentive to ever buy coins, so issuance would have to be much more limited -- which would hurt lower-income members disproportionately.
* '''Benefits''': No need to assess income.

Revision as of 14:46, 8 November 2024

FerretCoin (FC) is designed as a bridge between the unforgiving capitalist economy in which we currently live and the supportive socialist economy we want to create.

It is a lightweight non-blockchain digital currency, designed to be inexpensive to operate and decentralized while still having focal-points of accountability.

The larger goal is for this to be used by organizations that have some kind of revenue stream (from some combination of capitalism-compatible initiatives and donations) and want to provide a guaranteed-minimum quality-of-life to their members while also accumulating reserves of revenue and resources for the benefit of all.

Goals

  • minimal use of resources (including storage, transactions, and issuance)
  • disincentivizes hoarding, while still permitting it when needed
  • sold/issued in a way that equalizes buying power as much as possible ("marginal value token")

Mechanisms

Issuance Methods

Issuers may use either or both of the following, depending on their resources and priorities:

Method One: Marginal Value Tokens

Members of the issuing cooperative would have privileged access to that co-op's FC thusly:

  • If your disposable income is below a certain level, you receive regular allocations at no cost
  • If it's above that level, you have to buy them, but on a sliding-scale cost

Looked at more algorithmically, there would be a range of incomes relevant to the price:

  • below the range, you get free regular allocations
  • within the range, the price goes up from zero to full price
  • above the range, FC are full price

"Disposable income" is something the issuer would either evaluate themself or delegate to a trusted third party, based on any of several possible methodologies.

  • Costs: the difficulty of assessing income
  • Benefits: stronger flow of downward redistribution
Method Two: Universal Basic Income

Under this method, all members would receive a regular allocation of FC, and could purchase additional FC at a fixed price.

  • Costs: There's less incentive to ever buy coins, so issuance would have to be much more limited -- which would hurt lower-income members disproportionately.
  • Benefits: There's no need to assess income, saving costs and reducing barriers to entry.

Intentional Inflation

  • At regular intervals, the issuer creates a new "series" of their FC.
  • The issuer only accepts the current series as payment for regular sales.
  • The issuer will sell new coin for old, but at a discount.
    • e.g. 1 old coin will buy you 0.9 new coin
    • Software could handle this trade automatically, with user-configurable details.
    • The issuer may limit the time during which they will accept expired coins, or arbitrarily decide to stop accepting them (e.g. if a key is compromised).
      • After that, the old coin will retain some value in market trade, but that market value will generally deteriorate over time.

This means that any given collection of FC will only deteriorate in value over time, encouraging holders to spend it instead of hoarding. This also allows the issuer to continually issue new coinage, giving it spending power without requiring taxation or continuous economic growth.

Technology

Basics:

  • A FC token is just a chunk of data public-key signed by the issuer. The data could include details of the issuance, such as timestamp, server ID information etc.
  • Trading (converting FC to/from other currencies) would be conducted through third parties approved by the issuer, possibly using some delegative FOAF/web-of-trust mechanism to encourage a trading ecosystem.
  • The issuer would only accept payment for regular sales in FC, requiring all hoardable currency to pass through the various leveling mechanisms created by the FC ecosystem.